107 research outputs found

    Average mixing of continuous quantum walks

    Full text link
    If XX is a graph with adjacency matrix AA, then we define H(t)H(t) to be the operator exp⁑(itA)\exp(itA). The Schur (or entrywise) product H(t)∘H(βˆ’t)H(t)\circ H(-t) is a doubly stochastic matrix and, because of work related to quantum computing, we are concerned the \textsl{average mixing matrix}. This can be defined as the limit of C^{-1} \int_0^C H(t)\circ H(-t)\dt as Cβ†’βˆžC\to\infty. We establish some of the basic properties of this matrix, showing that it is positive semidefinite and that its entries are always rational. We find that for paths and cycles this matrix takes on a surprisingly simple form, thus for the path it is a linear combination of II, JJ (the all-ones matrix), and a permutation matrix.Comment: 20 pages, minor fixes, added section on discrete walks; fixed typo

    When can perfect state transfer occur?

    Full text link
    Let XX be a graph on nn vertices with with adjacency matrix AA and let H(t)H(t) denote the matrix-valued function exp⁑(iAt)\exp(iAt). If uu and vv are distinct vertices in XX, we say perfect state transfer from uu to vv occurs if there is a time Ο„\tau such that ∣H(Ο„)u,v∣=1|H({\tau})_{u,v}| = 1. Our chief problem is to characterize the cases where perfect state transfer occurs. We show that if perfect state transfer does occur in a graph, then the spectral radius is an integer or a quadratic irrational; using this we prove that there are only finitely many graphs with perfect state transfer and with maximum valency at most 4K4. We also show that if perfect state transfer from uu to vv occurs, then the graphs Xβˆ–uX\setminus u and Xβˆ–vX\setminus v are cospectral and any automorphism of XX that fixes uu must fix vv (and conversely).Comment: 16 page

    Bose-Mesner Algebras attached to Invertible Jones Pairs

    Get PDF
    In 1989, Vaughan Jones introduced spin models and showed that they could be used to form link invariants in two different ways--by constructing representations of the braid group, or by constructing partition functions. These spin models were subsequently generalized to so-called 4-weight spin models by Bannai and Bannai; these could be used to construct partition functions, but did not lead to braid group representations in any obvious way. Jaeger showed that spin models were intimately related to certain association schemes. Yamada gave a construction of a symmetric spin model on 4n4n vertices from each 4-weight spin model on nn vertices. In this paper we build on recent work with Munemasa to give a different proof to Yamada's result, and we analyse the structure of the association scheme attached to this spin model.Comment: 23 page
    • …
    corecore